Until Death Do Us Part - Jonas

Memaparkan catatan dengan label LayarArtikel. Papar semua catatan
Memaparkan catatan dengan label LayarArtikel. Papar semua catatan

Isnin, Jun 29, 2009

#587. Three-Point Lighting : The Art of Lighting for Film

Lighting is one of the most important aspects of motion pictures. It sets the tone of a film while giving two dimensional images the feeling of three dimensional life.Whether you are a big budget producer shooting on 35mm film or an independent film director working on a shoe string budget with a borrowed digital camera, there is one thing you will need or no one will ever see your film: Lighting. The three-point lighting system is the most common lighting scheme used in motion pictures. It uses a key light, a fill light, and a back light (or rim light). Using three lights from three different directions creates a sense of depth on people and objects guaranteeing everything will look three dimensional.

Key Light
The key light is the primary light used to illuminate a subject. It is usually positioned 15 – 45 degrees from one side of the camera and angled down 15 – 45 degrees from above the subject. This light represents the primary source of light in a scene simulating the sun, a window, a light bulb or some other source of light.

Fill Light
After the key light is positioned you will notice a harsh shadow on one side of the subject opposite the key light. The fill light is meant to reduce the shadow but not eliminate it entirely (shadow gives a sense of depth). A fill light should be placed on the opposite side of the key light but needs to be about half as bright and not positioned quite as high. Do not place it at the exact same angle as the key light. It is meant to simulate other light sources or light that is being reflected off other objects.

Back Light (Rim Light)
The back light needs to be placed behind the subject opposite the camera but high above both so that none of the light goes directly into the camera. This light will create a slight glow on the back of the subject and thus separate it from the background. This prevents the subject from looking two dimensional on the film. It is sometimes referred to as the hallo effect.

Source : Filmstudies [http://filmstudies.suite101.com/article.cfm/threepoint_lighting#ixzz0Jm5vhYRX&D]
© Sean Ryan Valinoti
Aug 4, 2007

Baca Sepenuhnya...

Sabtu, Mac 28, 2009

#355. How to Burn Movies Downloaded to DVD

For those of you who are old enough to remember those days when 8mm film on projector systems used to be the home theater system back then - you can definitely say that technology has literally overhauled the way that we watch movies. From bulky VHS tapes, to laserdiscs, to Video Compact Discs, Digital Video Discs to High Definition and Blu Ray technology - each generation has made improvements to bring the home theater system to the standards that it has now.

However, the problem with these types of viewing movie files is that the storage is quite 'bulky' - which is why downloaded movies has become more and more popular over the years. Because of the increase in Internet speed, downloading movies has become even more popular. What used to take several hours or even a day to download can now be downloaded in minutes.

A Multitude of Advantages from Downloading Movies

As previously mentioned, downloading movies have become commonplace in today's online community. There are even a couple of ways to download movies: legally or illegally. Naturally, downloading movie files 'illegally' are not recommended - but a lot of people are still doing it. Before delving deeper into the benefits of downloading movies legally, let us first enumerate the disadvantages of downloading movies illegally - which is usually done

- You are not paying the "intellectual rights holder" of the privilege to view the films that they made.

- Using P2P sites from not-so-trustworthy sources may harm your computer.

Now, here are the advantages of legally downloading movies: - You can download the movies that you want to watch, 24/7, as long as you have an active membership with a particular movie downloading site. - There are a lot of movie genres, as well as old and new films to choose from. - Downloading movies through legal sites is more convenient and cost-effective.

How to Burn Movies Downloaded to DVD

Now, after downloading those movies to your computer, how will you burn a copy of the film to a DVD? The primary benefit of burning the movies that you downloaded onto a DVD is that you can play the film on your regular DVD player. This way, it will be pretty easy to have a 'movie night' right in the comfort of your own home.

If you would like to burn the movies that you downloaded onto a DVD, here are some tips that you need to keep in mind.

1. Prior to downloading movies from legal movie download sites, make sure that the format of the movie files is compatible with your computer's media player. This way, if you decide to burn the movie that you downloaded later on - it will be a much easier process.

2. Again, prior to downloading movies from legal movie download sites, make sure that the picture quality can be assured. This is especially true if you will burn a copy of the film that you downloaded on a DVD later on.

3. Remember that if you buy a 'DVD-quality' movie from movie download sites, the quality of the film's sound and picture should not deteriorate. This means that the process will be like purchasing a 'real DVD' from a video store. The only difference is that you downloaded the file from the Internet and burned a copy of the movie onto the DVD yourself - at a fraction of the cost.

4. When going through several movie download sites, look for one which offers free software for burning a copy of your downloaded file onto a CD or DVD. This part is crucial, especially since you are paying for the benefit of downloading the movie online. If you bought a 'DVD quality' movie through legal movie download sites - look for one which offers free software so that it will be easier for you to burn the files on a hard copy.

5. If you do stumble upon a site which offers free DVD-burning software, make sure that they have round-the-clock customer or technical support. Most membership movie download sites have a customer or technical support line that you can call. This way, if you run across any problem in downloading the movies or using the software, it will be much easier for you to address the issue with the help of their support staff.

Fortunately for the movie buffs of today, getting their hands on the films that they want to see is as easy as 1, 2, 3. After downloading the files, you can easily burn a DVD copy of your favorite film with a click of the mouse.

Please take a look at out free movie downloads site if you want start burning high quality movies on DVDs.

Baca Sepenuhnya...

#354. Honest Movie Reviews to Help You Pick Better and Save Time

Honest movie reviews help the average movie-goers make good decisions and spend their time and money wisely on movies that they will thoroughly enjoy. Today there are an abundance of movie reviews appearing in regular magazines, newspaper supplements, specialty magazines, and websites. There are hundreds of movie reviews sites that offer movie reviews on films of all genres.

Movie reviews will be based on the opinionated and personal preferences of the reviewer. There are also passionate movie-goers who review movies. Reviews by these people detail the emotion that they experience while they were watching the movie. Readers of movie reviews, who share the passion of the reviewers, get a clear idea of what they can expect from the movie. Such reviews will not narrate the story line, but tell the readers what they want to hear about the movie. These passionate reviews are often the best movie reviews.

Movie going is mainly about the experience. A movie review must portray the exact feeling experienced while seeing the movie. The review must also make the reader feel enthused about watching the movie, but only if it is worthwhile. If the movie is not worth it, the reviewer must communicate this.

Ratings, usually on a five-star or a ten-star scale, appear beside all movie reviews. This rating is fairly useful, but it is only a number. It does not account for the experience that the reviewer had while watching the movie. Then again, this rating system is unavoidable when looking for movie reviews.

There are also other recommendations like 'Watch today', 'Wait until video is out' and 'Not worth the trouble'. Self-describing recommendations are often the best one-line movie reviews. Movie reviews don't just tell about the USCCB or MPAA ratings or the story line. They capture the imagination of the reader without revealing too much of the story line and make him or her feel like actually seeing the movie.

Read passionate reviews, including the opinion of reviewers, solely from the angle of a movie-goer. If these are the type of movie reviews that you are looking for, you’ve come to the right place. We also always list details such as the director, cast, and MPAA ratings. Our movie reviews are always based on a personal opinion of what is attractive in a movie or why it may not be worth your time.Unlike movie reviews in specialty magazines, there is no cost involved other than spending the time to read it. We have an extensive list of new first-run movies and the movies that are now available for purchase.

Movie reviews are also best when not confined into checklists like the quality of acting, sound, visual effects, camera, and direction. The reviewer has to convey his or her feelings to the audience. It is quite easy to give ratings on a five or ten-star scale. Actually conveying your feel on the movie is another thing. Movie reviews should be the communication of the opinion of the movie-goer to fellow movie-goers. Only then shall the write-up qualify as a movie review.

When writing movie reviews, the reviewers never forget to include vital information like the title, director, cast, and rating (MPAA) in a list or box format.

Movie reviewers too are as diverse as the movie genres. Some reviewers are hardcore science fiction fans, while others enjoy musical comedies more. Movie-goers need to know which movies to take their children to and which movies are best avoided.

Article Source: ABC Article Directory

Baca Sepenuhnya...

Rabu, Mac 25, 2009

#339. Tips for Organizing Your DVD Collection

As DVDs become more affordable some people find themselves with a large library of movies that are mixed up and difficult to find. Luckily, it is not difficult to organize your DVD collection if you are willing to put a little bit of time and effort into it. It really doesn't matter how you organize your DVD collection whether it is by colored DVD cases or alphabetical order. You could even arrange them by running time if you want. The point is that you should know the method to your madness and keep the madness organized well enough to find your favorite movies when you want to watch them. The following suggestions will help you organize your DVD collection.

DVD Cases
If you're space is limited, or if your DVD shelving is filling up, a great way to maximize the room you have is to move your DVD's to slim DVD cases instead of the standard sized cases. This will keep your DVD's from piling up next to your shelving or stacked randomly around your home. A quick label on each case will allow you to locate the DVD you're looking for fast and easy when ordered in a fashion described in further detail below. You can also utilized a "clam shell case" which is a container case with the ability to hold multiple DVD's. This is helpful when ordering your DVD's by genre or by actor.

Alphabetically
If you are burning a lot of movies on blank DVD-R discs then you may find the easiest way to organize your collection is by sorting them alphabetically. Simply write the name of the movie on the DVD cases so it is easy to determine where the movie goes in the alphabet and where it should be returned to after viewing. By far, alphabetizing your collection is the easiest / most popular way to sort your collection, and anyone will be able to follow it. This means the likelihood of the DVD collection staying organized is higher...maybe!

Genre
If you have lots of movies from different genres then you may want to organize them this way. The important thing is for you to know what genre something goes in. For example, do you have a genre for romance, a genre for comedies, and a genre for romantic comedies? Or, are all of them mixed together? These are some of the important questions that need to be asked before deciding on a particular organizational method. Keep in mind, though, that if this is the method chosen it is important to write the names on the DVD as well as the DVD cases.

Favorite Actors
If you are really into to specific actors then you will want to have blank DVD-R discs around at all times so you can burn your favorite movie as it comes on. When your collection grows large enough and you want to organize it you will be able to have a stack of Will Smith movies and another stack of Tom Cruise movies, and so on and so forth. Some people who are really into their favorite actors will think they want to see an Angelina Jolie rather than a comedy. It's all about how you think about your DVDs!

Chronologically
Another system some people find works for their DVD collection is to have them in chronological order. Of course, this will be harder for other people to use if they aren't aware of the movie's release date, but some people find this method very helpful to them. You can also order them by the date you purchased the DVD if you're unsure of the release date.

Remember to always have DVD cases and plenty of blank DVD-R discs on hand so you can burn your favorite movie, or just a movie you like, the next time it is showing. You will be able to build your DVD library by being prepared.

Baca Sepenuhnya...

#338. Jazz Movies: Best Films about Jazz

Everybody knows that the The Jazz Singer was the first ever sound film in history. In the almost eighty years that have passed since then, many jazz singers, jazz musicians and jazz orchestras appeared and or were the theme of many films. Here you can read about three of the top movies on jazz for jazz fans and fans of good cinema.

Bird 1988

Bird was the nickname of the great jazz saxophonist Charlie Parker. Bird is also the title of the biopic that was directed by Clint Eastwood on Bird who has been struggling for wide recognition of his music as well as fighting with his self destructive tendencies until his death in the early age of 34. However, the movie avoids depicting the cliche of the rise and fall of the drug addict musician. Mainly thanks to Eastwood whose love of jazz is evident in every scene of the 160 minutes feature. Talented Forest Whitaker plays an excellent leading role of Bird.

Charlie Parker fans do not need this recommendation, but they would probably appreciate the fact that the film soundtrack features original recording by Bird. Those who have seen documentaries about Parker would enjoy the great preparation work Whitaker has done for the role. Fans of Clint Eastwood tougher filmography would not be disappointed either, since Bird is definitely one of the best, if not the finest, movies directed by Eastwood.

Round Midnight 1986

The character of Dale Turner, whose relationship with a young French fan sets the plot of Bertrand Tavernier film of 1986, was inspired by several jazz legends such as Lester Young, Bud Powell and more. The great jazz saxophonist Dexter Gordon donated his personal experiences and acquaintances with the jazz world to create the role of the troubled jazz saxophonist who leaves his homeland and moves to Paris in a search of admiration. In Paris, Turner meets Francis Borler a local fan who becomes his caretaker who successfully helps him in his struggle with alcoholism, drug abuse, depression and trouble making.

Regardless to your taste in music, Round Midnight is an optimistic film that celebrates the love of people and the power of music. Unless your heart is made of stone, you cannot watch the scene in which Borler observes Turner from the other side of the road as he orders orange juice in a cafe without shedding a tear. Jazz fans would be happy to know that Herbie Hancock is responsible for the Academy Award winning music score.

Mo Better Blues 1990

A talented trumpeter who cannot make the right decisions in both his professional and personal life is in the center of Spike Lees 1990 film. Denzel Washington plays the role of the fictional New York trumpeter Bleek Gilliam who tangles with two girlfriends, Joie Lee and Cynda Williams, a competitive saxophonist, Wesley Snipes, who aims to take over the quartet he heads, and a manager, Spike Lee, with gambling problems.

As the son of the appreciated Jazz bass player, Bill Lee, Spike Lee was born and raised into the world of jazz. However, Mo Better Blues focuses mainly on Bleak personal issues. If you are expecting unusual insights, you might be disappointed but it still quality entertainment with excellent acting and good music. Bill Lee took care of the music score that includes music by Miles Davis, Branford Marsalis, Abbey Lincoln and other contemporary jazz musicians.

Bottom line, you do not have to be a fan of jazz to enjoy a good movie as much as you do not have to be an android to appreciate a good sci fi film. Whether you are a jazz fan or you fall asleep each time you hear the sound of an alt sax, the three movies recommended above are worth watching.

Baca Sepenuhnya...

#337. A Brief History of Anime

With the different animation techniques that was practiced and employed in France, USA, Russia, and Germany, Japanese filmmakers decided to experiment with the techniques at the start of the 20th century; thus began the history of anime. In 1917, a short 2 minute clip of animation which showed a samurai's attempt to test his new sword on a target was released. The samurai ends up failing in this clip of the oldest known anime.

By the time the 1930's came around, the poorly developed live-action industry of Japan was being challenged by this new storytelling alternative called anime. This was much unlike the live-action industry found in the United States. The industry remained a very small market with many issues stemming from being under-budgeted and casting. The main issue in casting was the fact that there were not very many Caucasian actors in Japan. This made it impossible to shoot movies which were to be set in Europe or America; a major problem which restricted plots to involve only Asians. Animation was a great way to battle this restriction as it allowed unlimited possibilities in plot lines.

In 1937, the huge success of an animated film in the United States became a major influence to the Japanese animators. This animated film was Disney's classic, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. The Godfather of Anime, Osamu Tezuka, employed and streamlined Disney's animation techniques which resulted in the reduction of number of frames which lead to the reduction of costs. This allowed him to produce animation films with limited resources, tight schedules, and inexperienced staff.

The popularity of manga, had a huge spike in the 1970's, especially those produced by Osamu Tezuka. Osamu Tezuka as well as the other pioneers of anime inspired the genres as well as specific characteristics which are considered to be fundamentals of the industry to this day. For example, the giant robot genre, known also as the Mecha genre, was originally introduced by Osamu Tezuka and revolutionized by Yoshiyuki Tomino. Mecha anime has produced series such as Gundam and Macross which are massive hits and considered classics in the industry. During the 1980s, anime was to experience a massive boom in terms of production as mainstream Japan learns to accept the industry.

Eventually, in the 1990s and 2000s, anime received quite a positive response in overseas markets after a few successful adaptations were released in the 1980s.

Source :abcArticles

Baca Sepenuhnya...

#336. Watch Movies Online Completely Free

As the internet is becoming a major part of our daily lives, it is becoming easier to watch newly released movies online. There are all sorts of benefits to watching movies online as opposed to going to the cinema or spending money that you haven't got at the local blockbuster store.

Firstly - you can watch newly released movies online in the comfort of your own home and you don't have to pay a penny for a cinema ticket! Secondly - some video stores are now charging up to $10 a night to rent a DVD. Why would you spend that money when you can watch movies online for free?

When you watch movies through your home cable or satellite package there are usually extra fees you have to pay for those movie, film or “specialty” channels. Watching movies online completely eliminates those fees with a click of your mouse button.

A lot of people are searching for this type of service but they are often disappointed with what they find. There are certain websites that advertise having free movies that you can watch and when you arrive at the site you are asked to fill out a survey or install an intrusive advertisement service to your PC. Luckily for you these disappointing and time consuming experiences are over!

There is now a completely different way of watching movies online for free. You won't have to fill out any surveys or install anything on your computer because all of your favorite movies are being hosted on well known video websites like YouTube and Google Video.

When users signed a contract with these video sites they were warned not to upload infringing content. But, because there are so many users of these websites it means they are getting harder and harder to police the uploaded content. The users who are uploading the movies are getting smarter and more cunning by disguising the movies name with a random code so website administrators can't search and remove them, meaning, luckily for you, (the viewer), you can watch more and more movies online for free!

But how do you find all these movies when they're all disguised by a code? The answer is simple! You go to a site which finds the movies for you! These movies websites don't host any content but are updated daily with direct links to all of your favourite movies. One click will send you directly to a huge archive of free movies to watch online!

You can find movies from all sorts of genres including: Action, Fantasy, Comedy, Adventure, Animation, Biography, Crime, Drama, Family, Film Noir, Game-Show, History, Horror, Music, Musical, Mystery, News, Romance, Sci-Fi, Short, Sport, Talk Show, Thriller, War, Western, Hindi and Korean.

Each movie post includes a movie synopsis, photos and screenshots, followed by a direct link for you to watch the movie. There are generally movie forums on the websites so you can take part in different movie discussions with other members to add to the community feeling.

Article Source: ABC Article Directory
Watch Movies Online at TheOnlyDevice.com

Baca Sepenuhnya...

#335. Changes in the Animated Film Industry

Animated films have been a part of our culture for just over 100 years. In 1906, a newspaper cartoonist named J. Stuart Blackton released the first fully animated film, “Humorous Phases of Funny Faces.” Since then, animation has used drawings and illustrations to entertain and delight many generations of viewers.

In the past decade, the animated film industry has seen a number of exciting changes. Computer Generated Imagery (CGI) is increasingly used, as well as using individual cells drawn by animators. Animated film budgets are also much higher than they once were. As a result, animated films are now receiving greater recognition and are not simply relegated to being kids’ films. Animation studios and their work are also garnering more attention because high-profile actors are doing voiceovers as opposed to relatively unknown actors.

During the first 90 years of animation and animated films, each cell of a film was drawn by animators. Any of the classic animated films by Disney, including “Snow White” or “Aladdin,” used this method. Hand drawn animation is still used in tandem with Computer-Generated Imagery (CGI). But, like everything else in our culture, animated films are advancing technologically, with CGI animation used for special effects. In 1995, “Toy Story” became the first feature-length animated film to use CGI.

Technology has raised the status of animated films, but star power has helped as well. When Disney’s “Aladdin” was released in 1992, it was one of the first feature-length animated films to feature the voice of a famous actor—Robin Williams as the Genie. Three years later, with the release of “Toy Story” viewers enjoyed being entertained by Tim Allen and Tom Hanks. This led to the phenomenon of other high-profile actors being cast in feature-length animated films.

Perhaps because they are making use of advanced technology and established actors, animated films are also more critically recognized than ever before. In 2002, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences added the Best Animated Film category to the Oscar awards. “Shrek” was the first to win the award. But, this category came after a long wait by animation studios to have animation recognized as an artistically valid medium of filmmaking. Before the award was introduced, “Beauty and the Beast” was the only feature-length animated film to be nominated for Best Picture.

The addition of this category to the Academy Awards Ceremony in 2002 had an affect on animation overall and increased interest in the medium. As animated feature films rise in popularity, animation has become more accepted and can now be found in a wider range of television commercials and even films not in the animated category such as Richard Linklater’s “A Scanner Darkly.”

The movement extends even beyond Hollywood; advertisers, web designers and marketing firms are now using animation due to its wide appeal with audiences. It is not unheard of for a branding agency to have an in-house animation studio to take advantage of this popular medium. From the movie screen to your computer screen, animation is becoming more prevalent.

Technology and star power have contributed to the animation phenomenon, and animation—a genre that has its roots in children’s entertainment—is now more widespread and widely respected than ever before.

Article Source: ABC Article Directory
www.Moujaes.com—create brands, entertainment and experiences with the Moujaes animation studio

Baca Sepenuhnya...

Selasa, Mac 24, 2009

#334. Film Directing

Film directing is an art form, that many people don't understand.Without good directing, a film with a great script and cast will probably not do well.They are chosen by the movie's producer, unless of course the producer and the director are the same person.Directors are chosen for their ability to bring a screenwriter's script to life using their unique interpretation of the script and subsequent portrayal of the material.

Sometimes writer's disapprove the director's creative input so it is important to have a legal agreement including compensation for allowing movie studios and directors to interpret the screenplay their own way.Some directors, such as George Lucas, act as producers, writers, and directors all at once. There have even been directors such as Peter Jackson who appear as actors in the films they are directing.

The director also guides the actors and actresses to deliver their lines and physically portray their characters in a way that is coherent with the entire story of the film.The best actor can say some lines "wrong" even if he gets the words exactly right, or the best actress can try to portray her character in a way that may not be best for the film.

Truth is a term used to denote whether the scenes seem believable. The more truthful, the better chance the scene will connect with the audience.Some film directors tend to micromanage projects. Newer actors and actresses usually find this beneficial but more mature professionals prefer minimal direction from directors.

This style of directing constitutes figuring out a general plot line and dramatic direction for the film and then permitting the cast members to interpret their characters, sometimes even letting them improvise new lines.Independent film directors direct films that are not produced by the major studios. Directors are more likely to play multiple roles in the making of these films. They can often enjoy total control over a film as a result.

TV directors do not enjoy nearly as much power. The writers and producers of TV shows are the main conceptualizers of how everything will look, sound, and feel, and thus TV directors are mainly act like office managers who help keep things in line but don't get to offer more than minor creative suggestions at best. TV directors do not get the glory film directors enjoy.

As glorious as a director seems, it doesn't always pay, and often it does not pay big money. Even when it does, it's so precarious that a director may go from earning millions of dollars this year to nothing at all for the next two years.

Many will never make millions. ~By: Joseph Vautour

Source : abcArticles
Joe Vautour runs www.tv-film-production-international.com a website dedicated to helping you get your film made.

Baca Sepenuhnya...

Isnin, Mac 23, 2009

#321. LayarArtikel : Become an Actor

The road to becoming an actor is not an easy one. I point this out off the top so as not confuse the idea of how to become an actor with how to become famous. In today's day and age, it is quite easy (perhaps too easy) to become famous. The fame achieved by uploading a quirky video on YouTube or auditioning for any of the dozens of reality shows can bring fame knocking on your door tomorrow. It will, however, be gone just as quickly. Finding ways to prolonging your 15 minutes of fame is not why you are here anyway!

Now that we cleared that up, let's focus on your road to a successful and fulfilling acting career. It's important to note that the road to success takes a lot of hard work, training, networking, risk and study with a good deal of being in the right place at the right time. Your personal type, look and style also play a part. For example, how in-demand is your type? Are there many roles written for your type?

First let's focus on your location. Do you live in a place that is conducive to pursuing a career as an actor? Are there a variety of classes and workshops offered? Are there some good headshot photographers around? Photographers that keep up with the industry trends and standards is a must. (A cousin of yours who has a camera may not be your best bet.) Is there a community theater that you can audition for to start building up credits? These are all things to consider about your location.

Once you answer yes, yes and yes to the questions about location, we can proceed to classes. Take classes. These can be classes offered in your high school, college or an outside setting, like private coaching. Some popular classes you may consider are monologue workshops (either one on one or in a group setting), scene study, acting for film and TV, audition technique, acting in soap operas, or voice-over study. Most reputable schools or workshops will offer new students the opportunity to audit a class before choosing to enroll. Take them up on this. It's free for you to sit in on the class as it's going on. Bring a notebook, take some notes and talk with the students afterwards to get their take and to answer any questions you may have. Most importantly, use your instincts to see if you feel comfortable in that setting. Finding a good class or two will set you on your way and you'll gain valuable skills, confidence and contacts. For the record, good professional actors study in some form or another their entire careers.

Next, before you can begin to audition, it'll be time to get professional headshots taken. This is usually an area where you get what you pay for so please do your proper research and take time to find the right photographer for you. Make some calls, and set up meetings with a few different photographers to ask questions, look through their portfolio to see past work and, perhaps most importantly, to see the vibe between the two of you. You really want a photographer that you feel comfortable with. One that you click with. Why? A good photographer will help bring out your best which will be worth your weight in gold at the end of the day when you see your contact sheets. A pro headshot photographer will help you find your style and make sure that your photos 'pop' when they land on the desk of agents and casting directors. No fake smiles or nothing going on behind your eyes if you find the right photographer to take your headshots. Research properly.

Now you've been taking your classes and you got your awesome headshots reproduced. Time to attach your resume to the back of your photo and start auditioning. "But what do I put on my resume?" you say. Remember those classes you've been taking? Or that community theater gig you landed? Or that play you did in 8th grade? Whatever is pertinent at this point, put it on your resume. Sure, it may not be much but it's a start, and we all have to start somewhere. Do not -- I repeat, do not -- ever lie on your resume. At no point in your career will it ever be wise to lie on you resume. This may seem like an obvious note, but you see it time and time again. An actor decides to put xyz credit on his resume and because this industry is so small and everyone knows everyone, it will back fire in a similar style to this: Casting Director: "Oh, you worked with Susan on The XYZ Show?" You: "Yeah!" Casting Director: "That's weird. I cast that show and I don't remember you..." See?!

You've now been taking classes, you have your perfect headshot and your resume is printed up... now what? It's time to take your skills and audition. Not many auditions going on in your area? This goes back to your location. Sure, you can build up training and knowledge and continue to educated yourself about the business, but at some point you must be where the work is. If you are serious about pursuing a career in show business, you may have to relocate to the many cities that support this. I use the phrase 'show business' deliberately to remind you that it is, in fact, a business. Not the topic of this article, but smart to keep in the back of your mind as you continue to learn about the 'biz.

Read, learn, study. It may seem mundane, but it is crucial to know how the industry works. Read books on the subject, subscribe to industry papers and magazines like Back Stage, Variety and Hollywood Reporter. All of those sites have plenty of free content to keep you in the loop. Talk to other actors, get involved in community theater, take classes. Like I said before, the road to becoming an actor is not an easy one. But it certainly is a rewarding one! Get out there, break a leg and keep us posted on your progress. And please submit any questions or comments below.

Side Note: There is a tremendous amount of struggle and rejection in the pursuit of a career in acting. You must get yourself and keep yourself in a positive and healthy mental, emotional and physical state. This is not always an easy achievement especially with outside forces weighing in. For example, we've received a lot of emails with the following content:

"But my parents do not want me to become an actor..."
"I want to become an actor but I have no money..."
"XYZ Associates wants me to pay $600 to audition for all the top agents and casting directors..."
"Is XYZ Associates a legitimate company or are they a scam?"

Sadly, we've heard these too many times and lived through it, first hand. We will address all those and more in upcoming articles.

By ActorPoint.com

Baca Sepenuhnya...

#319. Sinematografi : Shades of noir, a study in contrast

"LIGHT is an incredible thing that can't be described," cinematographer Stanley Cortez once said. "Only two of the directors I've worked with have understood it: Orson Welles and Charles Laughton."

During his 50-year career, Cortez was known for his mastery of composition, deep focus and light in such atmospheric black-and-white movies as Welles' 1942 drama, "The Magnificent Ambersons," and Laughton's only film as a director, the sinister 1955 thriller "The Night of the Hunter." "He was very high on contrast lighting," says film historian Chris Horak, curator of the Hollywood Entertainment Museum. "In the 1940s, as other cinematographers are going for gray tones, he is going much more for black-and-white effect. He is clearly working almost in a film noir style."

Several examples of Cortez's best work in the black-and-white medium will be featured in the Los Angeles County Museum of Art's retrospective "Let There Be Light: The Black-and-White Cinematography of Stanley Cortez," which opens Friday with "The Magnificent Ambersons" and the 1941 horror comedy "The Black Cat." Welles was so inspired by Cortez's work on the low-budget "Black Cat," which is primarily set in an old, dark house, that the director hired him for "Ambersons."

Cortez was born Stanislaus Kranz in New York City in 1908 to Austrian Jewish immigrant parents. His older brother, Jacob, went to Hollywood as an actor in the 1920s, and the studio soon transformed him into a Latin lover by the name of Ricardo Cortez. When Stanislaus followed his brother to Tinseltown, he changed his name to Stanley Cortez.Cortez began his career in New York in the 1920s working as an assistant to Edward Steichen during the photographer's portrait period. From Steichen, Cortez learned the skill of lighting faces.He soon made the leap to moving pictures. Watching a parade one day, Cortez introduced himself to Willard Van der Veer, a newsreel cameraman for Pathe Revue, who was covering the event.

Van der Veer helped Cortez get a job as an assistant on the 10-part 1925 serial "The Green Archer." When he moved to Hollywood, he worked as an assistant to such cinematographers as Tony Guadio, Karl Struss and Oliver Marsh. He segued to filming screen tests at Universal, and in 1937 he was promoted to head of photography for the "B" unit at the studio, where his cinematography was usually the highlight of such forgettable films as "Danger on the Air" and "Personal Secretary."

Though Cortez received an Oscar nomination for "Ambersons," his perfectionism led to delays and cost overruns. Eventually RKO cut the film by 50 minutes and reshot the ending without Cortez's or Welles' participation. Two years later, Cortez received his last nomination, for the glossy David O. Selznick war melodrama "Since You Went Away."

Throughout his career, which ended in 1980 with his miniature photography for the Irwin Allen disaster film "When Time Ran Out," Cortez worked on classy pictures as well as such turkeys as "Navy Vs. the Night Monsters" and "The Ghost in the Invisible Bikini." "He still belonged to a generation that worked [all the time]," says Horak. "Some things he put his heart into and others he didn't."

In addition to "Ambersons" and "Hunter," the retrospective features Cortez's work on the 1946 John Huston documentary, "Let There Be Light," chronicling the traumas suffered by World War II vets; 1947's "Smash-Up: The Story of a Woman," a stark drama of alcoholism; and Sam Fuller's 1963 cult favorite, "Shock Corridor," a melodrama set at a mental hospital.

Cortez became a highly vocal opponent to the colorization of black-and-white movies in the late 1980s.In 1989, he told the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights and Trademarks:

"I know that perhaps some young people in America today scorn the impressionistic beauty of the classic black-and-white films -- the master achievement of Hollywood's golden era. But because some people do not appreciate the black--and-white picture does not mean all should be robbed of seeing a classic in its original beauty and splendor

Cortez died in 1997.

Baca Sepenuhnya...

Selasa, Mac 17, 2009

#283. LayarArtikel : Low Budget Filmmakers Must Do Everything Required

So you say you have a burning desire to make an independent film and you will do what ever it takes to get the job done? You have a knowledge of film production and you fancy yourself an "independent" type? You care about the issues of the day and you want to reflect that in your art? Well, you better know what it takes before you decide to launch yourself into the world of low budget independent filmmaking. If you do not know, your independent film project may never see the light of day, or more importantly the light of a movie screen.

Making a very low budget or "independent" film is a double edged sword. On the one side you have the freedom to express your art without corporate considerations, but on the other side you have the daunting task of doing almost every job yourself. From writing, producing, directing, and acting to providing travel arrangements, applying make-up, and fixing broken equipment, low budget independent filmmakers cover the broad spectrum of chores and responsibilities. And that does not even cover the other responsibilities such as providing meals for everyone, rehearsals, etc...

All you have to do is look at the long list of credits at the end of any major movie in the theaters and you can see how much work it takes to make a motion picture. Low budget independent films also require a lot of work during the film production process, but the difference is you only have a handful of people to do all that work.

While in the midst of making my film Mike And The Magic Lamp I almost started to doubt whether I would ever finish it. I had been working on this very low budget independent film for about two years straight doing every aspect of the work myself when I suddenly started to run out of energy. The continuous filming that I was doing combined with a heavy work schedule at my real job (Stage Manager of TV shows in Hollywood) was starting to get to me. I would have to prepare everything before a film shoot, and then do just about everything during the film shoots. Once in a while I would have a loyal friend help me with the awesome responsibilities of film production. They would help me carry equipment, set it up, and then tear everything down and put it away each day, but you can only ask them to do so much if you are not paying them.

At one point during the filming of M&TML I passed out, fell off my director's chair and hit my head on the corner of the set. I was mentally and physically exhausted while only halfway through the film production process. The problem was that I was not yet creatively exhausted. The burning desire to make an independent film and enter it in all the major film festivals was still alive, but the vessel (my body) that allows me to create was in need of a little R&R. I would take a day off here and there but it was always hard to rest when you have that little creative voice in your head bugging you to get your independent film finished so the world can enjoy your art. I was very lucky that I only suffered a minor head injury from that accident.

I finally finished my independent film Mike And The Magic Lamp after four long years of endless film production work that nearly put me in the hospital from exhaustion. The film went on to win the Silver Award at the Worldfest Houston in 1998 along with several other awards that year at major film festivals like the Santa Clarita International Film Festival. That film gave me recognition as an independent filmmaker and inspired me to pursue the path of making independent films on my own terms.

I pushed myself to the limits mentally and physically to get my independent films made in the beginning of my career and it was just the springboard that I needed to get launched into the world of independent filmmaking. I may have doubted my body's ability to keep up with my creative drive, but I some how managed to strike an agreement between the two and get my independent films finished.

Before you take on the daunting task of making a low budget independent film almost completely by yourself, you have to ask yourself one thing; AM I REALLY COMMITTED to this idea? If you are not, then I suggest you find another outlet for your creativity. If you are committed, then pursue it with everything you have inside. Make a movie and enter it in film festivals. But before you begin, make sure you realize that your creative drive cares nothing about your health. ~Michael Connelly

Baca Sepenuhnya...

#282. LayarArtikel : Film editing - a hidden art?


When we watch a film, most of us have great difficulty in consciously perceiving the editing. Of course we know that every time there is a shift from one image to another, it is an edit, and we know that editing in general has to do with the establishing of rhythm in film. But we are often not sure of the concrete function of editing, and likewise of the contribution the editing process makes to the final film.

Therefore it is difficult for us to define what we mean when we discuss film editing in a specific film; when we try to categorise the different functions of film editing, we tend to mix up the issues.

For a film editor it is a cause for frequent amusement and/or irritation, that film reviewers are never able to point out the editor's contribution. If a film is described as very effectively cut but otherwise long and boring, the editor knows that the film may have contained conspicuous transitions of scenes that were invented during the shooting or in the scriptwriting, but that the editing was ineffective or even sloppy.

On the other hand many editors tend to ignore the fact that the concrete process of editing is not identical with film editing in general, and that film editors are not the only ones to contribute to the editing of the film.

The phenomenon of editing deals with all aspects of filmic rhythm - from the transition of one image to another or the detailed musical rhythm in a small sequence of edits, to the most general balancing of pace and rhythm in the overall narrative structure.

Major aspects of the editing of a film are created outside the editing room. The editor may be primary contributor in some areas of the editing, but the scriptwriter, the photographer and of course the director are also involved in determining the editing of a film.

Editing is a means of expression, with its own language. This language is created in the editing room as well as in the script writing process and on the set. And the editing usually works best if it is completely integrated with the other means of expression used in the given film.

The creative decisions that are made in each phase of the process of filmmaking have an influence on the editing process. When the script is being written, the scriptwriter creates the psychology of the characters and their mutual relations and actions as integrated parts of the dramatic structure of the film: the overall structure, the chronological order of events and the development of the plot. The scriptwriter works to incorporate the physical surroundings as a means of expression for the characters and the plot. Take, for example, a typical cliché such as the ticking of a clock: instead of simply letting the editor insert a "tick-tock" on the sound track, the scriptwriter can integrate the clock as part of the action by letting one of the characters look at the clock to see what time it is, and the clock may even become a dramatic tool in the development of the plot (a programmatic demonstration of this is seen in Ingmar Bergman's Cries and Whispers.)

On the set, many of the cinematographic effects that were invented in the script are carried out, and new ones are inspired by the physical environment and its visual and auditive potential.

The director decides where to use the master shot technique (master shots and close-ups for each character, the foundation for cross-cutting) and where to use the sequence shot technique (where the action of a scene is covered by a single shot until a new shot takes over the action that follows). Also the staging of scenes is often combined with the making of a storyboard in order to foresee how the individual images will fit together.

When the shooting starts, the manuscript is embodied by actors, locations, design, etc. This process has an influence on the story that is impossible to predict, and which often contradict the original intentions of the script.

It may be an actress that doesn't quite possess the seductive charm that the scriptwriter had imagined. It may be a beautiful sunset that turns into a miserable grey rain. Or it may be a dialogue that looked good on paper, but sounds artificial and literary when played by the actors.

It is one of the director's central tasks on the set to deal with this chaotic reality and to strive to recreate the script's original intentions in this: a "second writing" of the film. How well the director has succeeded on the set, becomes obvious in the editing room.

Not until the editor begins to assemble the different images of the film, is it clear whether - and to what degree - the intentions of the script have survived the shooting.

Typical problems that emerge in the editing room are, for example: 1) lack of different kinds of continuity; 2) cases where the emotional intention of a scene is not realized: you don't laugh at what was intended to be funny, or you laugh at a scene where you were supposed to cry; 3) the audience lacks information necessary to understand the relations between the characters or the action; or 4) the narrative creates expectations that are not fulfilled by the story as it evolves.

Such problems might not arise from the quality of the individual scenes, but from the fact that there are too many of them or that, when assembled, they do not produce the necessary dramatic flow.

It is the task of the editor to structure the build up every single moment of a scene and put those moments together into a whole with all the possibilities involved in the scriptwriting and the shooting - this can be a lot (if the story structure gives many possibilities to reverse the order of the scenes, or if the scenes contains cross cutting), and this may be little (if the scenes are built up by sequence shots or if the narrative development can be seen in the development of props).

In any case, the editing creates the flow and energy in the scenes and builds the scenes into sequences. This (re)creation of the general narrative structure is the "third writing" of the film.

Only rarely is it possible for the audience to determine whether an edit was conceived in the script, on the set or in the editing room. It is a common belief, that most montage and dialogue editing is conceived in the editing room, whereas most continuous action editing and transition between scenes are created in the script, not to mention the fundamentals of the overall story. Of course that is more often true than not. Yet there are many examples of the opposite.

As a result of the "final cut" problem, Alfred Hitchcock was reknowned for his ability to shoot exactly the footage he needed for dialogue editing. He wanted to be sure that the producer couldn't cut the film in a different manner than Hitchcock intended. In Denmark, Erik Balling was known for the same method of shooting all his footage for Olsen Banden, and in Sweden it took Ingmar Bergman's editor less than 5 weeks to edit Fanny and Alexander, because so many editing decisions were taken in advance.

George Roy Hill's Slaughterhouse 5 contains a complex story structure with a lot of transitions in time and space, and for these transitions the film uses an associative form of editing which is carefully constructed in the script and on the set. Yet the film editor Dede Allen explains, that many of the transitions didn't work - primarily for narrative reasons. Therefore she had to invent new transitions in the editing room, searching in the material for visual and associative connections that could be used to create the new transitions. In the finished film it is almost impossible to distinguish the preconceived transitions from the ones that were created in the editing room.

The overall narrative structure of a feature film is of course primarily conceived in the script. But during the editing it often happens that you cut out some of the characters or some of the subplots. And an often used "emergency tool" in the editing room is to insert a narrator or character voice-over. In some of Woody Allen's scripts, the ending of the film is briefly described with the words: "To be shot". He wants to edit the film before he decides how the film should end.

In documentaries you very often have a totally different working method, where you create your narrative structure in the editing room. A radical example of this is Claude Lanzmann's Shoah.

Another reason it is difficult to point out the editing's contribution to a specific film is that the audience simply doesn't notice it. It may notice spectacular transitions from one scene to another, or of course the edits that were meant to be noted - such as Jean-Luc Godard's jump cuts in Breathless - but in many cases the editing works as do overtones in sound: you react to them, but you can't really perceive them.

Walter Murch, the editor of Francis Ford Coppola's The Conversation and Apocalypse Now, pursues an editing style that is imperceptible to the audience.

During The Conversation he noticed that when he had a close-up of Gene Hackman and was going to decide how long he should hold it; how long it could sustain his interest, he would try to imagine what the character was thinking, and when he wasn't thinking the same thought anymore, he would cut. Murch found out that very often Gene Hackman blinked where Murch decided to cut.

Murch began to use the blink as a tool to determine how long to keep a shot on screen: when he edited a dialogue sequence between two characters, he would imagine that he was a third person watching that scene, and he would try to duplicate in the editing what that third person would do. As long he was thinking one particular thought he would usually not blink. But when the thought came to an end, he would blink and shift to another.

He realised that the purpose of the blink was to isolate images or thoughts on either side of the blink, and that the blink in that sense was a kind of mental punctuation mark.

So he came to see the cut as the equivalent, in filmatic terms, of the blink in human behavior.

Consequently the film can be seen as a series of thoughts, and the editor is helping the audience by determining how long each of these thoughts are; how long the audience is going to think about any given thing.

And ideally the audience would never notice the editing of such a scene, because they would blink simultaneously with the cuts.


Storytelling in film constantly deals with breaking and creating continuity, as all films are based on fragments of reality (constructed or real).

It is obvious that if you want to explain World War II in 90 minutes, you have to be very precise in what direction the camera is pointed, and when it is turned on. The challenge to the storyteller begins in the creation of sufficient continuity throughout the film for the spectator to feel that he is watching a continuous story and not disconnected fragments, and as to Walter Murch, the best tool in overcoming the problems of discontinuity is to imitate human perception and to let the imagination of the spectator become a co-narrator.

The brain will always strive to combine two separate informations, and the wider the gap between the two informations constructed by the filmmaker, the longer connection the brain will be forced to construct. (Of course the gap can be too wide and the connection fail. The audience will then perceive the fragments and they will likely lose their sense and credibility.)

If a cut is made in the time-continuity the audience will always try to imagine what happened in the meantime. There are numeruous historic film anecdotes about scenes that people recall with pleasure, but which only took place in the minds of those self-same people and not actually in the film.

The fact that the audience will always make up a good story in such situations, Murch bases upon an experiment where a person was looking through a kind of stereoscope that separates the view of the two eyes. A portrait was put in front of each eye, but it was the portrait of two different women. The person looking through the stereoscope would perceive one image of a woman. But what image? In the brain the two portraits would fuse into a third. A face that did not exist in reality, but only in the mind of the person - a pure figment of the brain.

If the person afterwards was told to estimate/appraise/value the looks of the three women (the two real and the figment), the person would always pick out the figment as the most beautiful!

Murch concludes that the human brain has a sort of aesthetic selection and an imagination that reality will never be able to match. And consequently the best narrative is the one that is created in the spectator's own mind. The film ideally works as a starter for the human fantasy, and the narrative gains thereby a first-rate partner and can benefit from this infinite co-poetic potential. The task of the filmmaker is to create gaps as wide as possible in every aspect of his storytelling and thus making the audience the other half of the narrator.

When filmmakers hear how theorists describe "the process of film creation," they are often amused: it always sounds as if every step of the process is carefully planned and constructed. The filmmakers know how accidental or circumstancial filmmaking really is, to say nothing of how unaware most filmmakers are of their reasons for doing what they do, when they work. I think most film editors will recognize Dede Allen's description of the editing process:

When I start cutting a movie, I always cut with ambivalence. I have a definite intention, a definite starting point: the dramatic function of the scene;. the psychology of the characters, etc. But when I become absorbed in the material, I suddenly see all the possibilities the material contains. The unexpected. Intended and unintended possibilities. I can't help wandering into the material. I milk the material for all the small possibilities I see in it. A look, a smile - after the director has said "cut!", an unintentional juxtaposition of two images. Afterwards I form a general view again. But it is in the ambivalence, in the collision between the general strategy and the pleasant distractions along the way that constitutes editing as art; the true life of the film.~ Vinca Wiedmann.
_____________________________________________________________________________________

References

Walter Murch visited The Danish Film School in 1985, and in 1987 Tómas Gislason interviewed him for The Editing Symposium at The Danish Film School.

Dede Allen visited The Danish Film School in 1997.
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Vinca Wiedemann
Born 1959. Educated as film editor at The Danish Film School 1986. Teacher at the film school since 1990. Since 1995 script and editing consultant for among others Susanne Bier, Jesper Jargil and Christian Braad Thomsen, and on theatre for Katrine Wiedemann. Is currently writing a screenplay for a Morten Korch feature film in collaboration with Lars von Trier, and is the producer of Jesper Jargil's documentary trilogy about Lars von Trier's artistic universe.

Baca Sepenuhnya...

Jumaat, Mac 13, 2009

#260. LayarArtikel : Dr. Naif Al-Mutawa: Art, the Universal Language of Religion

The creator of The 99—the popular group of Islamic superheroes—talks about the timeless connection between art and religion.

All art is at once surface and symbol. Those that go beneath the surface do so at their peril. Those who read the symbol do so at their peril. It is the spectator, and not life, that art mirrors.
—Oscar Wilde

Kuwait City - It is neither a secret nor a surprise that the first manifestation of religion was in art form. Cave drawings and hieroglyphics shine a light on the mind of early man seeking meaning in life. The abstract pictorial representations were gradually solidified into idols, and idolatry was born. But when the Abrahamic tradition took centre stage, idolatry was abolished throughout most of the world. Or was it?

Art is the only language that all humans share in common. Anyone can look at art and tell you what they think it means. A word can be written in hundreds of languages, but each word only makes sense to those few of us who understand that specific language. Even then, words within a language can have various meanings based on the context.

Take the word iqra in Arabic. Iqra is credited as being the first word revealed to the Prophet Muhammad in the Holy Qur'an. Ask most Arabs, and they will tell you that iqra means "read." They will also tell you that the Prophet was illiterate. And when asked why God would order an illiterate man to read, most will just shrug their shoulders. Why? Idolatry of the word iqra.

When people first communicated through the use of images, idols were - well, idolised. As methods of communication improved, the written word—in the form of holy books—often took the place of these idols. The more concrete the interpretation of a word, the more the actual image of that word is being idolised. Words communicate a depth and breadth of meaning that transcend the sum of their letters. For example, it just so happens that the word iqra can also be defined as "to spread," as in spreading a message or a religion. In essence, then, a rigid interpretation of God's words by man is nothing more than idol worship.

All Muslims believe that the Holy Qur'an is for all time and place. There are some Muslims who believe that the Qur'an is alive and as adaptable to today's society as it was in the day of the Prophet. But then, there are some Muslims who believe that there is only one interpretation of Islam, and like George Bush's interpretation of democracy, we should export it in a one-size-fits-all box throughout the world.

As a writer, I have had to negotiate abstract representations of my work with various ministry officials in various countries. I have met with people whose thoughts are so set in stone that they would make the mountains proud. It is a real shame that censors are still the intellectual gatekeepers of the world, the high priests of the idols we worship.

The human mind follows the same rules as the rest of nature. In all living things, diversity is the key to success, and losing diversity is equivalent to certain death. For example, the less diverse the gene pool from which one selects a mate, the more likely the offspring will be diseased. The human intellect works in the same way: the less access to a variety of ideas, the more "diseased" the intellect.

I grew up in a part of the world where George Orwell's Animal Farm was banned. It was also banned in the former Soviet Union. The Kremlin banned it because, as a totalitarian regime, it did not want democratic messages to be spread within its borders. The censors in the USSR chose to go beneath the surface of the allegory, understand the message in the book, and ban it accordingly. In my neck of the desert, it was banned because there was a pig on the cover. Go figure.

The Holy Qur'an was revealed in an Arabia that was alive with the richness of Jahiliya (pre-Islamic) period poetry. The miracle of the Qur'an was not only in its message, but also in the complexity of the syntax used to communicate that message. Its prose is unmatched in the history of the Arabic language. It is an absolute shame that the Qur'an continues to be held hostage by those who favour the idolatry of words over the depth of their meaning and the elasticity of the human intellect. ~By Dr. Naif Al-Mutawa
____________________________________________________________________

Dr. Naif Al-Mutawa is the creator of The 99, the internationally acclaimed group of superheroes based on Islamic archetypes. Recently, Forbes named The 99 one of the top 20 trends sweeping the globe. Dr. Al-Mutawa has had extensive clinical experience working with former prisoners of war in Kuwait as well as at the Survivors of Political Torture unit of Bellevue Hospital in New York. He has seen firsthand the cancer that intolerance can bring to any society. His direct contact with the horrors of prisons and with people tortured because of their religious and political beliefs, led to his writing a timeless children’s tale that won a UNESCO prize for literature in the service of tolerance.


Original Source & Credit :
http://tribecafilm.com

Baca Sepenuhnya...

Khamis, Januari 22, 2009

#25. LayarArtikel : How The Movies Made President

How the movies made a President
Published Date: 22 January 2009
By Manohla Dargis

LONG before this week's transformative breakthrough by Barack Obama, the presidencies of James Earl Jones in The Man, Morgan Freeman in Deep Impact, Chris Rock in Head of State and Dennis Haysbert in 24 helped us imagine it. In a modest way, they also hastened its arrival.

Make no mistake: Hollywood's historic refusal to embrace black artists and its insistence on racist stereotypes linger to this day. Yet in the past 50 years – or, to be precise, in the 47 years since Obama was born – black men in the movies have travelled from the ghetto to the boardroom, from supporting roles in kitchens, liveries and social-problem movies to the rarefied summit of the Hollywood A-list. During those years the movies have helped images of black popular life emerge, creating public spaces in which we could glimpse who we are and what we might become.

Modern African-American history has been, among other things, a series of firsts, and the first black movie star – the first to win an Oscar in a lead role and the first to see his name featured above the title in movie advertisements – was Sidney Poitier. For much of the 1960s Poitier bore the special burden of being the only one. He became a symbolic figure, not only for other African-Americans, but also for the nation as a whole: the Black Everyman.

In 1961, the year Obama was born, Poitier played Walter Lee Younger, the flawed, ambitious protagonist of A Raisin in the Sun. Subsequent roles would draw on some of that character's anger and idealism, but they were more concerned with addressing the thorny questions of African-American male authority. How does a black man assert leadership in a society that expects, and is often willing to enforce, his subservience? How does he reach some accommodation with the white world without sacrificing his integrity or his self-respect?

Confronting these challenges in movies like In the Heat of the Night and Guess Who's Coming to Dinner, Poitier became an ambassador to white America and a benign emblem of black power, though not a favourite of the Black Power movement. Almost as soon as they were released, in 1967, those earnest, integrationist, liberal pictures started to look old-fashioned and naïve.

In 1971, two years after the black scholar Larry Neal scolded Poitier in the New York Times for his choices ("There is no sense in being a million-dollar shoeshine boy"), Melvin Van Peebles' independent production Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song helped usher in a new kind of African-American male representation.

Hailed by one critic as the "first truly revolutionary black film made", this low-budget triumph and its roving, carnal hero offered a rollicking alternative to the neutered black male of the sort that Poitier had often played.

Yet even as he stood as a not-so-benign emblem of black power, erotic and otherwise, the hypersexualized black male also became fodder for white exploitation. In the years since, much like the virgins and whores of every colour in movies about women, black male characters have often been divided along an axis of virtue and sin, forced to play cop or thug, saint or sociopath. Such is the seductiveness of the black outlaw that, after watching Morgan Freeman slink across screen as a pimp called Fast Black in the tense 1987 drama Street Smart, Pauline Kael was moved to ask if he was the greatest American actor in movies.

Not all outlaws are pimps; sometimes they just roll like them. It seems telling that in 2002 Denzel Washington became the second African-American man to win an Oscar for best actor playing a dirty Los Angeles police detective, in the thriller Training Day. Washington brought a queasy erotic charge to his character's violence that seemed intended to erase every last trace of his stoic, heroic, Poitieresque profile in films such as Philadelphia and Remember the Titans. This was Denzel the Bad, with his black leather jacket and pumping big guns, cinematic soul brother to Samuel L Jackson in Pulp Fiction and just about every other movie Jackson has starred in where he has wreaked vengeance on anyone unlucky enough to get in his way.

The violence can be just as thrilling when it's strictly verbal. Richard Pryor was among the first comedians to discover that a white audience could be won over by being provoked and insulted. He built his stand-up act, which had wide crossover appeal, on a foundation of profane, confrontational truth-telling and never shied away from the briar patch of race.

Later, as his own career foundered, Pryor's influence spread far and wide. The line of succession passes through the career of Eddie Murphy, who provides a crucial (and sometimes underestimated) link in the continuum of black movie stars that runs from Poitier to Washington to Will Smith.

As a young member of the rebooted Saturday Night Live cast in the early 1980s, Murphy first made his mark lampooning black archetypes and celebrities of all kinds. In his concert movies and stand-up routines, he was swaggering and sometimes obnoxious, but his ability to combine ingratiating jokiness with cold-eyed hostility came through most successfully in feature films, where he made the transition from comic foil (in 48 Hrs and Trading Places) to action hero (in Beverly Hills Cop) with astonishing grace and speed.

When Murphy, on SNL, made fun of Bill Cosby – gumming a cigar and extolling the virtues of Jell-O Pudding Pops – it was an act both of homage and of Oedipal aggression. In 1984 Cosby may have already been a father figure to younger black entertainers, but his career as America's dad was just beginning, with the debut of The Cosby Show on NBC. The novelty of that series, at once revolutionary and profoundly conservative, lay in its insistence, week after week, that being black was another way of being normal.

The Cosby Show did not deny the existence of serious problems in black America – not least the problem of absent fathers – but the presence of Cliff Huxtable, in his own home and yours, suggested that the problems were not intractable.

And it is striking how powerful and appealing the figure of the Black Father has become in the past 25 years. Murphy himself, for instance, in the Dr Dolittle movies, is channelling the man he used to mock. Even Ice Cube, without shedding his gangster scowl, settled into a comfortable niche as a family man in the Barbershop and Are We There Yet? franchises.

Black men have also flourished on screen as surrogate, spiritual fathers. Routinely paired opposite callow, less expert actors such as Keanu Reeves, Ashley Judd and Ben Affleck, Morgan Freeman in particular can be relied on to provide counsel and ballast to even the most lightweight genre exercises, along with a sense of purpose and moral seriousness. Much like James Earl Jones before him, though with less basso profundo, Freeman has become the go-to guy for voice-of-God narration, and for playing the Big Man upstairs.

In Hollywood, black characters have often provided this kind of advisory role, chirping friendly counsel from the sidelines, as when an avuncular Bill Robinson (aka Bojangles) teaches Shirley Temple how to dance up a flight of stairs in The Little Colonel. These mentor-student relationships invoke what the historian Donald Bogle calls the "huck-finn fixation", movies in which a good white man, having gone up against the corrupt (white) mainstream, takes up with a "trusty black who never competes with the white man and who serves as a reliable ego padder". The white hero "grows in stature" from this association because "blacks seem to possess the soul the white man searches for". For years, the price of this soul was sometimes paid in black flesh. Movie history is littered with the mangled (Joe Morton in Terminator 2), flayed (Freeman in Unforgiven) and even mauled (Harold Perrineau in The Edge) bodies of supporting black characters.

There has often been a distinct messianic cast to this sacrifice, made explicit in films as different as the 1968 zombie flick Night of the Living Dead and the 1999 prison drama The Green Mile. In the latter, Michael Clarke Duncan plays a death-row inmate who suggests a prison-house Jesus: "I'm tired of people being ugly to each other. I'm tired of all the pain I feel and hear in the world every day." More recently, Will Smith picked up the mantle of the Black Messiah in four of his star turns: The Pursuit of Happyness, I Am Legend, Hancock and Seven Pounds.

Saviour, counsellor, patriarch, oracle, avenger, role model – compared with all this, being president looks like a pretty straightforward job. But the fantasies of black heroism that have pervaded American popular culture give some sense of what the country hopes for in its new leader, whose burden is not the same as the one taken up by the 43 white men who preceded him.

Blazing a trail for the black acting profession in Hollywood:

1 SIDNEY POITIER The first black man to win a best actor Oscar (in 1963), Poitier blazed a trail in Hollywood, going on to star in era-defining films such as Guess Who's Coming to Dinner. In later years he would go on to direct the huge Richard Pryor and Gene Wilder hit, Stir Crazy.

2 SPIKE LEE Over 20 years after his debut film, She's Gotta Have It, Lee remains the most visible black director in Hollywood, as well as its most provocative. His 2006 documentary about the New Orleans flood, When The Levees Broke, was a damning attack on the US government's failure to deal with a crisis situation in a mostly black-populated area.

3 WILL SMITH The biggest movie star in the world, Smith remains one of very few actors who can virtually guarantee big box-office success – even with films as dark as I Am Legend.

4 HALLE BERRY One of the most highly paid actresses in Hollywood, Berry was the first (and so far only) black woman to win the Oscar for Best Actress in a Leading Role, for Monster's Ball in 2002.

5 MORGAN FREEMAN The veteran actor brings gravitas to every role he plays, which explains why he's been cast as both the president of the USA (in Deep Impact) and God (in Bruce Almighty).

Source: The Scotsman
Location: Edinburgh

Baca Sepenuhnya...

#9. LayarArtikel - 2008 : Tahun Menarik Filem Malaysia

06hb Januari, 2009
Utusan Malaysia

APAKAH pembikin filem kita masih menghasilkan filem sebagai satu bentuk produk industri sahaja atau menghasilkan filem untuk memenuhi keperluan penonton?

Ini satu bentuk hubungan yang menarik antara filem sebagai produk industri atau filem untuk memenuhi keperluan khalayak. Pada awal abad ke-20 dahulu filem-filem Hollywood yang dihasilkan untuk memenuhi standard industri mula tercabar dengan filem-filem yang lebih bersifat individual.

Apabila hubungan filem dengan kehidupan semakin dekat, maka filem sebagai produk impian semakin hilang pengertiannya.

Pengalaman dan derita manusia abad 21 semakin kompleks menyebabkan mereka tidak dapat menerima gambaran kehidupan yang dibentuk oleh industri sedemikian rupa sebaliknya melihat kebersahajaan produk sesebuah filem dalam mengungkapkan erti kehidupan yang mereka alami.

Penonton makin mengharapkan kematangan pembikin filem dalam menghadapi kenyataan hidup sehari-hari yang kompleks dan semakin berubah.

Sememangnya hubungan ini semakin sulit.

Para pembikin filem sememangnya menyedari filem semakin melibatkan penonton dalam proses penghasilannya kerana filem mereka akhirnya merupakan satu bentuk penghayatan yang bersifat individual.

Pada masa yang sama, filem perlu memenuhi keperluan industri yang melihatnya sebagai produk hiburan massa.

Filem membawa kesatuan ini antara produk seni budaya yang memerlukan penghayatan dan juga produk industri yang perlukan keuntungan.

Artikel ini menilai sejauh mana pencapaian filem-filem kita pada 2008.

Untuk tahun 2008 sebanyak 27 buah filem tempatan telah ditayangkan (termasuk dua filem kecil iaitu Jarum Halus dan Pungguk Rindukan Bulan).

Membuka tayangan 2008 adalah filem Kala Malam Bulan Mengambang (KMBM) iaitu sebuah filem genre noir yang dihasilkan dalam hitam putih karya dan arahan Mamat Khalid.

Menutup tayangan 2008 adalah filem Cicakman 2: Planet Hitam dan filem Brainscan - Aku dan Topi Ajaib arahan Ahmad Idham.

Filem KMBM mengungguli tahun 2008 dengan memenangi anugerah Filem Terbaik pada Festival Filem Malaysia 2008 dan Anugerah Skrin TV3 2008.

Apa yang menarik filem KMBM bukan sahaja menunjukkan keyakinan Mamat dalam menghasilkan filem yang menongkah arus perdana filem Melayu.

Sebaliknya, ia turut memperlihatkan usaha dan eksperimen berani pihak produser dalam mengembangkan seni filem tempatan melalui filem yang dianggap bukan dalam standard komersial industri filem masa kini.

Begitu juga filem Wayang karya dan arahan Dr. Hatta Azad Khan merupakan usaha yang wajar dipuji.

Filem ini mengangkat isu seni budaya tempatan yang terpinggir untuk dipaparkan kepada khalayak komersial filem tempatan.

Subjeknya cukup menarik, mencabar dan cukup relevan dengan usaha mengangkat isu budaya tempatan ke dalam sebuah filem.

Akan tetapi, filem ini sebenarnya memerlukan pendekatan pembikinan dan strategi pasaran yang lebih tepat.

Sebenarnya tahun 2008 harus dilihat sebagai tahun yang menarik bagi perkembangan seni filem tempatan.

Kehadiran barisan pengarah baru yang berpotensi dengan pendekatan naratif yang berbeza yang tidak hanya mengikut selera komersial tetapi cuba memberikan pendekatan baru yang mencabar khalayak penonton tempatan.

Selain filem KMBM dan Wayang, filem-filem lain yang turut menemui penonton ialah Budak Kelantan karya dan arahan Wan Azli, Susuk karya dan arahan Amir Muhammad (filem arus perdana pertama arahan Amir yang sebelum ini menghasilkan filem-filem dokumentari dan bebas) dan Naeim Ghalili, Cuci karya dan arahan Hans Isaac.

Tidak ketinggalan filem Antoo Fighter karya dan arahan Azizi Chunk Adnan, Kami: The Movie arahan Effende Mazlan & Fariza Azlina Isahak, Histeria arahan James Lee (filem arus perdananya yang pertama sebelum ini terkenal kerana filem bebas My Beautiful Washing Machine) dan filem kecil Pungguk Rindukan Bulan karya dan arahan Azhar Rudin.

Apa yang menarik mengenai gelanggang perfileman Melayu tahun lalu ialah kemunculan dua pengarah filem bebas, Amir dan James yang lebih tertarik untuk menghasilkan filem dalam genre seram.

Amir memberikan stail dan pendekatan yang agak kompleks dalam pendekatan naratif Susuk dan James bereksperimen dengan unsur sinematik dalam Histeria.

Untungnya genre ini masih mampu memberikan pulangan pasaran yang baik iaitu kedua-dua filem mereka melepasi kutipan RM2 juta.

Antoo Fighter walaupun kutipannya agak sederhana tetapi filem ini yang banyak menggunakan Imej Janaan Komputer cuba menggabungkan pendekatan permainan video komputer, pendekatan yang agak meluas dalam filem-filem Hollywood.

Tetapi tiga buah filem yang cukup menarik perhatian saya daripada pengarah generasi baru ini ialah filem Budak Kelantan, Kami dan Pungguk Rindukan Bulan.

Filem Budak Kelantan dan Kami adalah filem arahan pengarah muda dengan stail yang segar adalah genre yang mengangkat isu anak-anak muda dalam persahabatan dan kesetiaan serta harapan mereka.

Lebih menarik filem Budak Kelantan dengan kos tidak lebih RM500,000 dihasilkan sepenuhnya dalam dialek Kelantan yang pada saya memperlihatkan bukan sahaja realiti subjeknya.

Ia turut mencerminkan keyakinan Wan Azli terhadap budaya tempatan secara lebih dalam untuk dihidangkan kepada audiens yang lebih luas dan mungkin nanti untuk kajian antarabangsa.

Sementara filem Pungguk Rindukan Bulan walaupun hanya sebuah filem bebas dan kecil tetapi filem ini membuat pendekatan yang sangat menarik iaitu gabungan naratif dramatik dan stail pembikinan filem dokumentari.

Filem ini mengangkat isu pembangunan dan kemusnahan sebuah kehidupan dari sudut pandangan seorang kanak-kanak.

Keberanian yang dibawa oleh pembikin filem baru inilah yang mampu mengembang dan memajukan filem tempatan dalam jangka masa panjang.

Bagaimanapun, sebagai sebuah industri, penghasilan filem tempatan tidak terlepas dari perkiraan pulangan dari pasaran.

Hanya empat buah filem 2008 yang memberikan pulangan melebihi RM4.5 juta iaitu Duyung arahan A. Razak Mohaideen, Evolusi KL Drift arahan Shamsul Yusuf Haslam dan filem Congkak serta Senario The Movie: Episod 1 arahan Ahmad Idham.

Sungguhpun dari aspek pendekatan cerita filem-filem ini dianggap biasa dan komedinya kasar, tetapi pendekatan begini terus relevan dan berjaya memenuhi selera khalayak terbanyak penonton filem tempatan yang dianggarkan antara 250,000 hingga 300,000 orang.

Tetapi jika matlamat hendak mencapai sejuta penonton maka pendekatan baru dari segi penceritaan dan pemasaran perlu dilakukan.

Untuk tahun 2009 pula, sudah 27 buah filem telah disenarai untuk ditayangkan.

Apakah filem-filem tahun 2009 jauh lebih menarik daripada filem-filem 2008?

Pada masa yang sama bagaimana dengan usaha kerajaan untuk mengeluarkan dana menghasilkan filem-filem kenegaraan atau bercorak patriotik seperti yang diumumkan Menteri Perpaduan, Kebudayaan, Kesenian dan Warisan Malaysia, Datuk Seri Shafie Afdal pada Festival Filem Antarabangsa Kuala Lumpur 2008 lalu?

Apakah perancangan dan bagaimana bentuk filem patriotik yang akan dihasilkan nanti?

Sejauh mana nilai peradaban, budaya, sejarah dan pemikiran bangsa akan diangkat oleh filem itu nanti dapat dihayati dan pada masa yang sama dapat ditonton sebagai karya seni yang menyenangkan?

Peranan Perbadanan Kemajuan Filem Nasional (Finas) di bawah pengerusi baru, Datuk Razali Ibrahim walaupun sering dikritik tetapi tidak dinafikan memainkan peranan penting dalam mengembangkan industri filem tempatan dengan cabaran yang semakin kompleks.

Ini kerana filem bukan sahaja dilihat pada untung rugi sebagai produk dagangan tetapi sebagai karya seni, filem harus mampu mengangkat pemikiran bangsa serta citra seni budaya mereka.

Baca Sepenuhnya...

Layar Reader

Layar Komuniti II

Empunya Diri

Foto saya
Nature Luver, Movie Buff, Bookworm, Photogeek, Bread Krazy,

Layar Frenz I

Layar Subscribe

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to My AOL

Subscribe in Bloglines

Layar Frenz II

Layar Community

  ©Layar 2009 Template by Our Blogger Templates

Back to TOP